somewhere?
Also,
a new file, arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/cc_platform.c, has been
created for powerpc to hold the out of line function.
Cc: Andi Kleen
Cc: Andy Lutomirski
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Cc: Baoquan He
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: Daniel Vetter
On 27.07.21 14:57, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 02:54:14PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 24.07.21 02:27, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 01:17:46AM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
Since commit 903cd0f315fe ("swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_b
at turned out to be a fragility in
commit 64e1f0c531d1 ("s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected
virtualization"), which ain't exactly broken in its original context,
but could give us some more headache if people backport the broken
change and forget this fix.
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic
Tested-by
On 23.07.21 16:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:50:57AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 23.07.21 10:47, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:14:19 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Resending with the correct email of Heiko
On 23.07.21 03:12
On 23.07.21 10:47, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 08:14:19 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Resending with the correct email of Heiko
On 23.07.21 03:12, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:22:58 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 20.07.21 15:38, Will Deacon
Resending with the correct email of Heiko
On 23.07.21 03:12, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:22:58 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 20.07.21 15:38, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi again, folks,
This is version two of the patch series I posted yesterday:
https
On 23.07.21 03:12, Halil Pasic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:22:58 +0200
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 20.07.21 15:38, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi again, folks,
This is version two of the patch series I posted yesterday:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210719123054.6844-1-w...@kernel.org
On 20.07.21 15:38, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi again, folks,
This is version two of the patch series I posted yesterday:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210719123054.6844-1-w...@kernel.org
The only changes since v1 are:
* Squash patches 2 and 3, amending the commit message accordingly
* Add
; - __builtin_return_address(0));
> + return (unsigned long)__vmalloc_node(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE,
> + THREADINFO_GFP, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> + __builtin_return_address(0));
Looks sane.
Acked-by: Chri
On 08.04.20 13:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> alloc_vm_stack can use a slightly higher level vmalloc function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 5 ++---
wrong subject (power vs s390)
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On 20.02.20 17:31, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:23:20PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> >From a users perspective it makes absolutely perfect sense to use the
>> bounce buffers when they are NEEDED.
>> Forcing the user to specify iommu_p
On 20.02.20 17:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 05:06:05PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
>> Currently force_dma_unencrypted() is only used by the direct
>> implementation of the DMA API, and thus resides in dma-direct.h. But
>> there is nothing dma-direct specific about it: if
Alex,
patch 1 and 3 are s390 specific, 2 and 4 are vfio common code.
Are you ok with the common code changes? If yes, would you prefer to have this
via the s390 tree (Martin) or your tree?
On 10.05.19 10:22, Pierre Morel wrote:
> To use the VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO to retrieve IOMMU specific
13 matches
Mail list logo
