Hi Russell,
On Thursday 25 May 2017 16:05:41 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:26:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Again, the patch I propose is the simplest v4.12-rc fix I can think of,
> > short of reverting your complete IOMMU probe deferral patch series. Let's
Hi Russell,
On 5/25/2017 8:35 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:26:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Again, the patch I propose is the simplest v4.12-rc fix I can think of,
>> short
>> of reverting your complete IOMMU probe deferral patch series. Let's focus o
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 02:26:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Again, the patch I propose is the simplest v4.12-rc fix I can think of, short
> of reverting your complete IOMMU probe deferral patch series. Let's focus on
> the v4.12-rc fix, and then discuss how to move forward in v4.13 and be
Hi Laurent,
On 5/24/2017 4:56 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 24 May 2017 16:01:45 Sricharan R wrote:
>> On 5/24/2017 4:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:46:51AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 18:53:19 Russell K
Hello,
On Wednesday 24 May 2017 16:01:45 Sricharan R wrote:
> On 5/24/2017 4:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:46:51AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 18:53:19 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:55:57PM +0
Hi Russell/Laurent/Robin,
On 5/24/2017 4:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:46:51AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 18:53:19 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:55:57PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:46:51AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Tuesday 23 May 2017 18:53:19 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:55:57PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 23/05/17 17:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >> So, I've come to app
Hi Russell,
On Tuesday 23 May 2017 18:53:19 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:55:57PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 23/05/17 17:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >> So, I've come to apply this patch (since it's finally landed in the
> >> patch system), and I'm no
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 05:55:57PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 23/05/17 17:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > So, I've come to apply this patch (since it's finally landed in the patch
> > system), and I'm not convinced that the commit message is really up to
> > scratch.
> >
> > The curre
016 8:37 PM
>>> To: Sricharan R ; will.dea...@arm.com;
>>> j...@8bytes.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-
>>> ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org;
>>> laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; m.szyprow...@samsung.com;
>>> tf..
rg; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-arm-
> >ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-arm-...@vger.kernel.org;
> >laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; m.szyprow...@samsung.com;
> >tf...@chromium.org; srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/8] arm: dma-
..@vger.kernel.org;
>laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; m.szyprow...@samsung.com;
>tf...@chromium.org; srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/8] arm: dma-mapping: Reset the device's dma_ops
>
>On 04/10/16 18:03, Sricharan R wrote:
>> The dma_ops
On 04/10/16 18:03, Sricharan R wrote:
> The dma_ops for the device is not getting set to NULL in
> arch_tear_down_dma_ops and this causes an issue when the
> device's probe gets deferred and retried. So reset the
> dma_ops to NULL.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy
This seems like it could stand indepen
The dma_ops for the device is not getting set to NULL in
arch_tear_down_dma_ops and this causes an issue when the
device's probe gets deferred and retried. So reset the
dma_ops to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R
---
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/a
14 matches
Mail list logo
