On 2020/7/2 16:22, Hanjun Guo wrote:
As I said in previous email, I'm not against this patch, and seems
have no regressions for platforms that using named component node
such as D05/D06 (I will test it shortly to make sure), but it's better
to update the wording of the spec (even after this
On 2020/7/9 17:21, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:22:00PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2020/7/2 0:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-06-30 14:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2020/6/30 18:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:22:00PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On 2020/7/2 0:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2020-06-30 14:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > On 2020/6/30 18:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
Hi Robin,
On 2020/7/2 0:12, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2020-06-30 14:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2020/6/30 18:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
For devices that aren't described in the DSDT - IORT translations
are determined by their
On 2020-06-30 14:04, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2020/6/30 18:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
For devices that aren't described in the DSDT - IORT translations
are determined by their ACPI parent device. Do you see/Have you
found any
On 2020/6/30 18:24, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
For devices that aren't described in the DSDT - IORT translations
are determined by their ACPI parent device. Do you see/Have you
found any issue with this approach ?
The spec says
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:06:41AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
[...]
> > For devices that aren't described in the DSDT - IORT translations
> > are determined by their ACPI parent device. Do you see/Have you
> > found any issue with this approach ?
>
> The spec says "Describes the IO relationships
On 2020/6/29 17:05, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:24:43PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2020/6/19 16:20, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
When the iort_match_node_callback is invoked for a named component
the match should be executed upon a device with an ACPI
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:24:43PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On 2020/6/19 16:20, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > When the iort_match_node_callback is invoked for a named component
> > the match should be executed upon a device with an ACPI companion.
> >
> > For devices with no
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2020/6/19 16:20, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
When the iort_match_node_callback is invoked for a named component
the match should be executed upon a device with an ACPI companion.
For devices with no ACPI companion set-up the ACPI device tree must be
walked in order to find the
When the iort_match_node_callback is invoked for a named component
the match should be executed upon a device with an ACPI companion.
For devices with no ACPI companion set-up the ACPI device tree must be
walked in order to find the first parent node with a companion set and
check the parent node
11 matches
Mail list logo
