Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma-direct: check for overflows on 32 bit DMA addresses

2019-10-31 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 14:41 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:00:43PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> > +   /* Check if DMA address overflowed */
> > +   if (min(addr, addr + size - 1) <
> > +   __phys_to_dma(dev, (phys_addr_t)(min_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)))
> > +   return false;
> > +#endif
> 
> Would be nice to use IS_ENABLED and PFN_PHYS here, and I also think we
> need to use phys_to_dma to take care of the encryption bit.  If you then
> also introduce an end variable we can make the whole thing actually look
> nice:
> 
> static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t
> size)
> {
>   dma_addr_t end = addr + size - 1;
> 
> if (!dev->dma_mask)
> return false;
> 
>   if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) &&
>   min(addr, end) < phys_to_dma(dev, PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn)))
>   return false;
> 
> return end <= min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask);
> }
> 
> Otherwise this looks sensible to me.

Thanks, noted.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma-direct: check for overflows on 32 bit DMA addresses

2019-10-30 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 01:00:43PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> + /* Check if DMA address overflowed */
> + if (min(addr, addr + size - 1) <
> + __phys_to_dma(dev, (phys_addr_t)(min_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)))
> + return false;
> +#endif

Would be nice to use IS_ENABLED and PFN_PHYS here, and I also think we
need to use phys_to_dma to take care of the encryption bit.  If you then
also introduce an end variable we can make the whole thing actually look
nice:

static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
{
dma_addr_t end = addr + size - 1;

if (!dev->dma_mask)
return false;

if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT) &&
min(addr, end) < phys_to_dma(dev, PFN_PHYS(min_low_pfn)))
return false;

return end <= min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask);
}

Otherwise this looks sensible to me.
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu


[PATCH v2 1/2] dma-direct: check for overflows on 32 bit DMA addresses

2019-10-18 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
As seen on the new Raspberry Pi 4 and sta2x11's DMA implementation it is
possible for a device configured with 32 bit DMA addresses and a partial
DMA mapping located at the end of the address space to overflow. It
happens when a higher physical address, not DMAable, is translated to
it's DMA counterpart.

For example the Raspberry Pi 4, configurable up to 4 GB of memory, has
an interconnect capable of addressing the lower 1 GB of physical memory
with a DMA offset of 0xc000. It transpires that, any attempt to
translate physical addresses higher than the first GB will result in an
overflow which dma_capable() can't detect as it only checks for
addresses bigger then the maximum allowed DMA address.

Fix this by verifying in dma_capable() if the DMA address range provided
is at any point lower than the minimum possible DMA address on the bus.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne 
---
 include/linux/dma-direct.h | 8 
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
index adf993a3bd58..af4bb9c81ccc 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #define _LINUX_DMA_DIRECT_H 1
 
 #include 
+#include  /* for min_low_pfn */
 #include 
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA
@@ -27,6 +28,13 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, 
dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
if (!dev->dma_mask)
return false;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
+   /* Check if DMA address overflowed */
+   if (min(addr, addr + size - 1) <
+   __phys_to_dma(dev, (phys_addr_t)(min_low_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT)))
+   return false;
+#endif
+
return addr + size - 1 <=
min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask);
 }
-- 
2.23.0

___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu