On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:45:24AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> Joerg -- please can you take this on top of the pull request I sent already?
> Vivek included it as part of a separate series which I thought was going
> via arm-soc, but actually it needs to go with the other arm-smmu patches
> in
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:16 PM Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:35:07PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current
> > arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible
> > along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 02:35:07PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current
> arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible
> along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
> Reviewed-by:
Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current
arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible
along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring
Cc: Will Deacon
---
Hi Joerg,
I am picking this out
