On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:58:58AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> It's because it's written on the tree with another fix patch I sent
> beforehand ("[PATCH 1/2] dma-direct: Don't repeat allocation for no-op
> GFP_DMA").
>
> Could you check that one at first? I'm fine to rebase and resubmit
> this
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 11:47:02 +0200,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:18:19PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > As the recent swiotlb bug revealed, we seem to have given up the
> > direct DMA allocation too early and felt back to swiotlb allocation.
> > The reason is that
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 05:18:19PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> As the recent swiotlb bug revealed, we seem to have given up the
> direct DMA allocation too early and felt back to swiotlb allocation.
> The reason is that swiotlb allocator expected that dma_direct_alloc()
> would try harder to get
