On 19 Feb 2021 12:24, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > As of today, the proposal has been approved for inclusion in the next
> > release of the ACPI spec (whatever version gets released post the 6.4
> > version that just came out).
> >
>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:39:43PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> As of today, the proposal has been approved for inclusion in the next
> release of the ACPI spec (whatever version gets released post the 6.4
> version that just came out).
>
> Congratulations ?!? :)
>
> And thanks to all for their
On 17 Feb 2021 10:37, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 02:31:03PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > Would you believe last week's meeting was canceled, too? Not sure
> > why the chair/co-chair are doing this but I'm finding it a little
> > frustrating.
> >
> > We'll try again this
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 02:31:03PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> Would you believe last week's meeting was canceled, too? Not sure
> why the chair/co-chair are doing this but I'm finding it a little
> frustrating.
>
> We'll try again this week ... again, apologies for the delays. I'd
> recommend
On 04 Feb 2021 13:25, Al Stone wrote:
> On 03 Feb 2021 09:46, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > Hi Al,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone
On 03 Feb 2021 09:46, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > Hi Al,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > > > I updated the doc:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 01:27:13PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > > I updated the doc: https://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/viot/viot-v9.pdf
> > > > You can incorporate it
On 02 Feb 2021 10:17, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > > I updated the doc: https://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/viot/viot-v9.pdf
> > > You can incorporate it into the ASWG proposal.
> > > Changes since v8:
> > > * One typo
Hi Al,
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:18:25PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > I updated the doc: https://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/viot/viot-v9.pdf
> > You can incorporate it into the ASWG proposal.
> > Changes since v8:
> > * One typo (s/programing/programming/)
> > * Modified the PCI Range node to
; m...@redhat.com; Boeuf,
Sebastien
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:01:27PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> On 03 Dec 2020 22:21, Yinghan Yang wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > I'm sorry for the delayed response. I think th
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:01:27PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> On 03 Dec 2020 22:21, Yinghan Yang wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > I'm sorry for the delayed response. I think the new "PCI range node"
> > description makes sense. Could you please make this change in the proposal?
> >
> > Other than
> Sebastien ; a...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal
>
> Hi Yinghan,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:05:28PM +, Yinghan Yang wrote:
> > Thank you for the clarifications. In cases where a large range of PCI
> > segments m
Hi Yinghan,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:05:28PM +, Yinghan Yang wrote:
> Thank you for the clarifications. In cases where a large range of PCI
> segments may be assigned to guest, would it make sense to describe this
> configuration as base + count. Currently, one would have to describe
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question regarding VIOT proposal
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:13:53AM +, Yinghan Yang via iommu wrote:
> Hi iommu developers,
>
>
>
> I have a question regarding the recent VIOT submission for supporting
> paravirtualized IOMMU in guests. Th
14 matches
Mail list logo
