On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:23:59PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The "num_tlb_lines" might not be a power-of-2 value, being 48 on
> Tegra210 for example. So the current way of calculating tlb_mask
> using the num_tlb_lines is not correct: tlb_mask=0x5f in case of
> num_tlb_lines=48, which will trim
The "num_tlb_lines" might not be a power-of-2 value, being 48 on
Tegra210 for example. So the current way of calculating tlb_mask
using the num_tlb_lines is not correct: tlb_mask=0x5f in case of
num_tlb_lines=48, which will trim a setting of 0x30 (48) to 0x10.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen
---
dri
