Borislav Petkov writes:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> TBH, I don't see how
>>
>> if (force_dma_decrypted(dev))
>> set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)cpu_addr, 1 << page_order);
>>
>> makes more sense than the above. It's both
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Borislav Petkov writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:06:15AM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >> Let me add another vote from a native English speaker that "unencrypted" is
> >> the appropriate term to imply the *absence* of
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:25:49PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> TBH, I don't see how
>
> if (force_dma_decrypted(dev))
> set_memory_encrypted((unsigned long)cpu_addr, 1 << page_order);
>
> makes more sense than the above. It's both non-sensical unless there is
9087c37584fb
Borislav Petkov writes:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:06:15AM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Let me add another vote from a native English speaker that "unencrypted" is
>> the appropriate term to imply the *absence* of encryption, whereas
>> "decrypted" implies the *reversal* of applied
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:06:15AM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Let me add another vote from a native English speaker that "unencrypted" is
> the appropriate term to imply the *absence* of encryption, whereas
> "decrypted" implies the *reversal* of applied encryption.
>
> Naming things is
[since this is in my inbox...]
On 2020-03-19 10:28 am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I thought we agreed that decrypted is absolutely the wrong term.
I don't think we did. At least I don't know where we did that.
So NAK - if you
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I thought we agreed that decrypted is absolutely the wrong term.
I don't think we did. At least I don't know where we did that.
> So NAK - if you want to change things it needs to go the other way.
We are already using
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:16:57AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here's v2 with build breakage fixed on ppc and s390 (obviously I can't
> grep :-\) and commit message extended to explain more why.
I thought we agreed that decrypted is absolutely the wrong term.
So NAK - if you want to
Hi,
here's v2 with build breakage fixed on ppc and s390 (obviously I can't
grep :-\) and commit message extended to explain more why.
Thx.
---
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:03:05 +0100
Back then when the whole SME machinery started getting mainlined, it
was agreed that for
