On 1/24/22 3:10 PM, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi,
The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
iommu subtree. As we have reached a consensus that all these features
should be based on the new iommufd framework (which is under active
development), the first part of this series
On 2022-01-26 13:27, Jason Gunthorpe via iommu wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 09:51:36AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
they are fundamentally different things in their own right, and the ideal
API should give us the orthogonality to also bind a device to an SVA domain
without PASID (e.g. for KVM
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 09:51:36AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > they are fundamentally different things in their own right, and the ideal
> > > API should give us the orthogonality to also bind a device to an SVA
> > > domain
> > > without PASID (e.g. for KVM stage 2, or userspace assignment of
On 1/25/22 11:16 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 02:48:02PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
Agreed, certainly an IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA type that can both encapsulate the mm
and effectively replace iommu_sva seems like a logical and fairly small next
step. We already have the
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 02:48:02PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Agreed, certainly an IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA type that can both encapsulate the mm
> and effectively replace iommu_sva seems like a logical and fairly small next
> step. We already have the paradigm of different domain types supporting
>
On 2022-01-24 17:44, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:46:26AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
Hi,
The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
iommu subtree. As we have reached a consensus that all these
> From: Jason Gunthorpe
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 1:44 AM
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:46:26AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Lu Baolu
> > > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:46:26AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Lu Baolu
> > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
> > iommu subtree. As we have reached a consensus that all these features
> >
> From: Lu Baolu
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 3:11 PM
>
> Hi,
>
> The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
> iommu subtree. As we have reached a consensus that all these features
> should be based on the new iommufd framework (which is under active
>
Hi,
The guest pasid and aux-domain related code are dead code in current
iommu subtree. As we have reached a consensus that all these features
should be based on the new iommufd framework (which is under active
development), the first part of this series removes and cleanups all
the dead code.
10 matches
Mail list logo