BSOD with [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:54:34PM -0400, Jérôme Glisse wrote: > (Sorry for so many list cross-posting and big cc) Ditto (trimmed it a bit already, feel free to limit replies as you see fit). > > Please help testing ! > Kernels 4.13 and 4.14 (which both contain these patch series in its final

Re: BSOD with [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On 30/11/2017 10:33, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > > It was reverted in 785373b4c38719f4af6775845df6be1dfaea120f after which > the symptoms disappeared until this series was merged, which contains > > 369ea8242c0fb5239b4ddf0dc568f694bd244de4 mm/rmap: update to new mmu_notifier > semantic v2 > >

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback v2

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 05:17:25PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > Jérôme Glisse (13): > dax: update to new mmu_notifier semantic > mm/rmap: update to new mmu_notifier semantic > powerpc/powernv: update to new mmu_notifier semantic > drm/amdgpu: update to new mmu_notifier semantic >

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > I will wait for people to test and for result of my own test before > > reposting if need be, otherwise i will post as separate patch. > > > > > But from a _very_ quick

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

taskboxtes...@gmail.com liked your message with Boxer for Android. On Sep 1, 2017 10:48 AM, Jeff Cook wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > I will wait for people to test and for

[PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback v2

From: Jérôme Glisse (Sorry for so many list cross-posting and big cc) Changes since v1: - remove more dead code in kvm (no testing impact) - more accurate end address computation (patch 2) in page_mkclean_one and try_to_unmap_one - added tested-by/reviewed-by

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:56:15PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > I will wait for people to test and for result of my own test before > reposting if need be, otherwise i will post as separate patch. > > > But from a _very_ quick read-through this looks fine. But it obviously > > needs testing. > >

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 20:56 -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:11:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > People - *especially* the people who saw issues under KVM - can you > > try out Jérôme's patch-series? I aded some people to the cc, the full > > series is on lkml.

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:11:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jérôme Glisse wrote: > > > > Note this is barely tested. I intend to do more testing of next few days > > but i do not have access to all hardware that make use of the

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jérôme Glisse wrote: > > Note this is barely tested. I intend to do more testing of next few days > but i do not have access to all hardware that make use of the mmu_notifier > API. Thanks for doing this. > First 2 patches convert existing

[PATCH 00/13] mmu_notifier kill invalidate_page callback

(Sorry for so many list cross-posting and big cc) Please help testing ! The invalidate_page callback suffered from 2 pitfalls. First it used to happen after page table lock was release and thus a new page might have been setup for the virtual address before the call to invalidate_page(). This