On 2022/4/23 17:00, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/23 16:51, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/23 16:37, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-23 09:01, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2022/4/19 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16
On 2022/4/23 16:51, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/23 16:37, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-23 09:01, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2022/4/19 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14
On 2022/4/23 16:37, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-23 09:01, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2022/4/19 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@
On 2022-04-23 09:01, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Robin,
On 2022/4/19 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int
Hi Robin,
On 2022/4/19 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int iommu_bus_init(struct bus_type
*bus)
*/
int
On 2022-04-22 19:37, Krishna Reddy wrote:
Good effort to isolate bus config from smmu drivers.
Reviewed-By: Krishna Reddy
Thanks!
I have an orthogonal question here.
Can the following code handle the case, where different buses have different
type of SMMU instances(like one bus has SMMUv2
Good effort to isolate bus config from smmu drivers.
Reviewed-By: Krishna Reddy
I have an orthogonal question here.
Can the following code handle the case, where different buses have different
type of SMMU instances(like one bus has SMMUv2 and another bus has SMMUv3)?
If it need to handle the
On 2022/4/19 15:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int iommu_bus_init(struct bus_type
*bus)
*/
int
On 2022-04-19 00:37, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int iommu_bus_init(struct bus_type *bus)
*/
int bus_set_iommu(struct bus_type *bus, const struct
On 2022/4/19 6:09, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int iommu_bus_init(struct bus_type *bus)
*/
int bus_set_iommu(struct bus_type *bus, const struct iommu_ops *ops)
{
- int err;
-
- if
On 2022-04-16 01:04, Lu Baolu wrote:
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int iommu_bus_init(struct bus_type *bus)
*/
int bus_set_iommu(struct bus_type *bus, const struct iommu_ops *ops)
{
- int err;
-
- if (ops == NULL) {
- bus->iommu_ops =
On 2022/4/14 20:42, Robin Murphy wrote:
@@ -1883,27 +1900,12 @@ static int iommu_bus_init(struct bus_type *bus)
*/
int bus_set_iommu(struct bus_type *bus, const struct iommu_ops *ops)
{
- int err;
-
- if (ops == NULL) {
- bus->iommu_ops = NULL;
-
Move the bus setup to iommu_device_register(). This should allow
bus_iommu_probe() to be correctly replayed for multiple IOMMU instances,
and leaves bus_set_iommu() as a glorfied no-op to be cleaned up next.
Note that although the handling of errors from bus_iommu_probe() looks
inadequate, it is
13 matches
Mail list logo
