On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:24:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
> shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
> contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o
> a PASID table, the device could
Hi Ashok,
On 09/07/2018 07:13 AM, Raj, Ashok wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:24:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:24:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
> shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
> contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o
> a PASID table, the device could
On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 02:24:16PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
> shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
> contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o
> a PASID table, the device could
Pasid table memory allocation could return failure due to memory
shortage. Limit the pasid table size to 1MiB because current 8MiB
contiguous physical memory allocation can be hard to come by. W/o
a PASID table, the device could continue to work with only shared
virtual memory impacted. So, let's
