>>> +ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(nvidia_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, NVIDIA_SMMUV2);
>> The ARM MMU-500 implementation is unmodified. It is the way the are
>> integrated and used together(for interleaved accesses) is different from
>> regular ARM MMU-500.
>> I have added it to get the model number and to be a
On 30/08/2019 19:16, Krishna Reddy wrote:
+ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(nvidia_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, NVIDIA_SMMUV2);
From the previous discussions, I got the impression that other than the
'novel' way they're integrated, the actual SMMU implementations were unmodified
Arm MMU-500s. Is that the case,
>> +ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(nvidia_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, NVIDIA_SMMUV2);
> From the previous discussions, I got the impression that other than the
> 'novel' way they're integrated, the actual SMMU implementations were
> unmodified Arm MMU-500s. Is that the case, or have I misread something?
The ARM
On 29/08/2019 23:47, Krishna Reddy wrote:
Add Nvidia SMMUv2 implementation and model info.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
drivers/iommu/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 2 +
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 97
Add Nvidia SMMUv2 implementation and model info.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
drivers/iommu/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c | 2 +
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 97 +
drivers/iommu
