Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:59:49PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:39 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:05:39PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 AM Sharat Masetty > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > index 6515dbe..986098b 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties: > > > >- enum: > > > >- qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2 > > > >- qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2 > > > > + - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 > > > >- qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2 > > > >- const: qcom,smmu-v2 > > > > > > Is anything blocking this patch from landing now? > > > > I thought updates to the bindings usually went via Rob and the device-tree > > tree, but neither of those are on cc. > > > > Perhaps resend with that fixed? > > Ah, I guess I wasn't familiar with how things worked for this file, or > maybe things have changed recently? I'm used to most bindings going > through the same tree as the drivers that use them. Usually if things > are at all complicated maintainers wait for an Ack from Rob (so he > should have been CCed for sure) and then land. Just to clear this up: I'm happy to take DT stuff like this, but preferably with Rob's ack so that I know that (a) it's not a load of rubbish and (b) it probably won't conflict with his tree. So having the DT folks omitted from the CC list just rings alarm bells for me. > In this case it actually looks like Bjorn landed it in the Qualcomm > and I just didn't realize it. That seems like it should be fine since > it's in the middle of a clause that's all Qualcomm and the change > shouldn't be controversial in any way. :-) Ok! Will ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string
Hi, On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:39 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:05:39PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 AM Sharat Masetty > > wrote: > > > > > > This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > index 6515dbe..986098b 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties: > > >- enum: > > >- qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2 > > >- qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2 > > > + - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 > > >- qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2 > > >- const: qcom,smmu-v2 > > > > Is anything blocking this patch from landing now? > > I thought updates to the bindings usually went via Rob and the device-tree > tree, but neither of those are on cc. > > Perhaps resend with that fixed? Ah, I guess I wasn't familiar with how things worked for this file, or maybe things have changed recently? I'm used to most bindings going through the same tree as the drivers that use them. Usually if things are at all complicated maintainers wait for an Ack from Rob (so he should have been CCed for sure) and then land. In this case it actually looks like Bjorn landed it in the Qualcomm and I just didn't realize it. That seems like it should be fine since it's in the middle of a clause that's all Qualcomm and the change shouldn't be controversial in any way. :-) Thanks! -Doug ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:05:39PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 AM Sharat Masetty wrote: > > > > This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > index 6515dbe..986098b 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties: > >- enum: > >- qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2 > >- qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2 > > + - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 > >- qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2 > >- const: qcom,smmu-v2 > > Is anything blocking this patch from landing now? I thought updates to the bindings usually went via Rob and the device-tree tree, but neither of those are on cc. Perhaps resend with that fixed? Will ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string
Hi, On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 AM Sharat Masetty wrote: > > This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. > > Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > index 6515dbe..986098b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties: >- enum: >- qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2 >- qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2 > + - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 >- qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2 >- const: qcom,smmu-v2 Is anything blocking this patch from landing now? -Doug ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string
Hi, On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:30 AM Sharat Masetty wrote: > > This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. > > Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
[PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add sc7180 compatible string
This patch simply adds a new compatible string for SC7180 platform. Signed-off-by: Sharat Masetty --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml index 6515dbe..986098b 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ properties: - enum: - qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2 - qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2 + - qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 - qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2 - const: qcom,smmu-v2 -- 1.9.1 ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
