On 2021-04-01 10:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Steven,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:40 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:31:03 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
This reduces kernel size by ca. 0.5 KiB.
If you are worried about size, disable tracing and it will go away
Hi Steven,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:40 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:31:03 +0200
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > This reduces kernel size by ca. 0.5 KiB.
>
> If you are worried about size, disable tracing and it will go away
> entirely. 0.5KiB is a drop in the bucket
On Wed 2021-03-31 09:40:07, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:31:03 +0200
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > This reduces kernel size by ca. 0.5 KiB.
>
> If you are worried about size, disable tracing and it will go away
> entirely. 0.5KiB is a drop in the bucket compared to what
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:31:03 +0200
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> This reduces kernel size by ca. 0.5 KiB.
If you are worried about size, disable tracing and it will go away
entirely. 0.5KiB is a drop in the bucket compared to what tracing adds in
size overhead.
Sorry, but NAK.
This has been
While long fancy messages have a higher probability of being seen than
small messages, they may scroll of the screen fast, if visible at all,
and may still be missed. In addition, they increase boot time and
kernel size.
The correct mechanism to increase importance of a kernel message is not
to
