On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:42:27PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > + list_for_each_entry(smmu, &arm_smmu_devices, list) {
> > > + if (arm_smmu_disable_is
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:00:01AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > (Depending on DT information and module parameters) each device is put
> > into its own protection domain (if possible). For configuration with
> >
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:36:19PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> (Depending on DT information and module parameters) each device is put
> into its own protection domain (if possible). For configuration with
> one or just a few masters per SMMU that is easy to achieve.
>
> In case
(Depending on DT information and module parameters) each device is put
into its own protection domain (if possible). For configuration with
one or just a few masters per SMMU that is easy to achieve.
In case of many devices per SMMU (e.g. MMU-500 with it's distributed
translation support) isolati
