On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:43:53AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Acked-by: Joerg Roedel
>
> Does this ack mean that Rob is expected to apply this together with
> patch 2?
"Expected" is a strong word. I'd more phrase it like I
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 02:52:10PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:28:45PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Currently of_for_each_phandle ignores the cell_count parameter when a
> > cells_name is given. I intend to change that and let the iterator fall
> > back to a
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:28:45PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Currently of_for_each_phandle ignores the cell_count parameter when a
> cells_name is given. I intend to change that and let the iterator fall
> back to a non-negative cell_count if the cells_name property is missing
> in the
Currently of_for_each_phandle ignores the cell_count parameter when a
cells_name is given. I intend to change that and let the iterator fall
back to a non-negative cell_count if the cells_name property is missing
in the referenced node.
To not change how existing of_for_each_phandle's users
