Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-04-21 Thread Robin Murphy
: Linuxarm ; lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; j...@8bytes.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; w...@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang ; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) ; sami.muja...@arm.com; j...@solid-run.com; eric.au...@redhat.com; laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com; h...@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT

RE: [PATCH v10 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-04-21 Thread Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via iommu
ieral...@arm.com; > j...@8bytes.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; w...@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang > ; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) > ; sami.muja...@arm.com; j...@solid-run.com; > eric.au...@redhat.com; laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com; h...@infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IO

Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-04-21 Thread Steven Price
On 20/04/2022 17:48, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > Hi > > v9 --> v10 > - Dropped patch #1 ("Add temporary RMR node flag definitions") since >the ACPICA header updates patch is now in the mailing list[1] > - Based on the suggestion from Christoph, introduced a >resv_region_free_fw_data()

[PATCH v10 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

2022-04-20 Thread Shameer Kolothum via iommu
Hi v9 --> v10 - Dropped patch #1 ("Add temporary RMR node flag definitions") since the ACPICA header updates patch is now in the mailing list[1] - Based on the suggestion from Christoph, introduced a resv_region_free_fw_data() callback in struct iommu_resv_region and used that to free