Hi Thomas,
On 22/07/2016 14:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Auger Eric wrote:
>> On 20/07/2016 10:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
+bool msi_doorbell_safe(void)
+{
+ struct irqchip_doorbell *db;
+ bool irq_remapping = true
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Auger Eric wrote:
> On 20/07/2016 10:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> +bool msi_doorbell_safe(void)
> >> +{
> >> + struct irqchip_doorbell *db;
> >> + bool irq_remapping = true;
> >> +
> >> + mutex_lock(&irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
> >>
Hi,
On 20/07/2016 10:12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
>> +bool msi_doorbell_safe(void)
>> +{
>> +struct irqchip_doorbell *db;
>> +bool irq_remapping = true;
>> +
>> +mutex_lock(&irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
>> +list_for_each_entry(db, &irqchip_doorbel
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
> +bool msi_doorbell_safe(void)
> +{
> + struct irqchip_doorbell *db;
> + bool irq_remapping = true;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(db, &irqchip_doorbell_list, next) {
> + irq_remapping &= db->i
msi_doorbell_safe returns whether all the registered doorbells
implement irq_remapping.
When assigning a PCIe device whose host controller is upstream to
an IOMMU, we currently do not know whether the MSI controller is
upstream or downstream to the IOMMU.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
---
include/l
