On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:33:58PM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:25:01AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > That also looks fine to me, although I'd like to write the parsing code in
> > > my driver before I
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:25:01AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> > That also looks fine to me, although I'd like to write the parsing code in
> > my driver before I commit to anything!
Right, I hacked that up this afternoon and it s
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:16:39PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:41:47PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:58:46AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > Again, y
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:16:39PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:41:47PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:58:46AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Again, you also need to tie in topology information if you go down this
> > > rou
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:41:47PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:58:46AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
[snip]
> > > I also think that it is more useful to move the stream-id property to
> > > the devic
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:58:46AM -0400, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Hi Will,
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> > so far, I thought, that this proposal is fine. After I have tried to
> > make use of the binding I have some points that might need f
Hi Will,
so far, I thought, that this proposal is fine. After I have tried to
make use of the binding I have some points that might need further
disucssion.
Olav already asked (in another thread) how to model the mapping of
stream IDs to contexts for master devices that support multiple
contexts.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:50:20AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hi Andreas,
> so far, I thought, that this proposal is fine. After I have tried to
> make use of the binding I have some points that might need further
> disucssion.
Sure, although I've been using the binding without is
This patch adds a description of the device tree binding for the ARM
System MMU architecture.
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Andreas Herrmann
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
---
.../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 66 ++
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
