On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:57:20PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Thanks for having reworked this. I'm quite happy with the way this looks
> now (modulo the couple of nits Robin and I mentioned, which I'm to
> address myself).
>
> Jorg: are you OK with this going via the irq tree?
As-is this has a
Hi Julien,
On 29/04/2019 15:44, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On RT, the function iommu_dma_map_msi_msg expects to be called from
> preemptible
> context. However, this is not always the case resulting a splat with
> !CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP:
>
> [ 48.875777] BUG: sleeping function
Hi all,
On RT, the function iommu_dma_map_msi_msg expects to be called from preemptible
context. However, this is not always the case resulting a splat with
!CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP:
[ 48.875777] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:974
[
