On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:04:33AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Robin]
>
> This series looks fine to me as far as PCI is concerned, and I'd be
> happy to take it via my tree given an ack from David for this IOMMU
> piece. Alternatively, you can add my
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas
>
> to t
On 18/08/17 17:04, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Robin]
>
> This series looks fine to me as far as PCI is concerned, and I'd be
> happy to take it via my tree given an ack from David for this IOMMU
> piece. Alternatively, you can add my
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas
>
> to the other patches if you
[+cc Robin]
This series looks fine to me as far as PCI is concerned, and I'd be
happy to take it via my tree given an ack from David for this IOMMU
piece. Alternatively, you can add my
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas
to the other patches if you want to take it via another tree.
Robin raised a questio
VMD child devices must use the VMD endpoint's ID as the requester.
Because of this, there needs to be a way to link the parent VMD
endpoint's iommu group and associated mappings to the VMD child devices
such that attaching and detaching child devices modify the endpoint's
mappings, while preventing