On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 05:05:21PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:58 AM Bjorn Andersson
> wrote:
> > Would you be able to respin this patch, so that we could unblock the
> > introduction of the display nodes in the various device?
>
> Will pointed [1] to the restructuring o
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 3:58 AM Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
>
> On Wed 19 Jun 04:34 PDT 2019, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:25 PM Will Deacon wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:45:51PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > > There are scnenarios where drivers are required t
On Wed 19 Jun 04:34 PDT 2019, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:25 PM Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:45:51PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > There are scnenarios where drivers are required to make a
> > > scm call in atomic context, such as in one of the qco
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:25 PM Will Deacon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:45:51PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > There are scnenarios where drivers are required to make a
> > scm call in atomic context, such as in one of the qcom's
> > arm-smmu-500 errata [1].
> >
> > [1] ("https://source
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:45:51PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> There are scnenarios where drivers are required to make a
> scm call in atomic context, such as in one of the qcom's
> arm-smmu-500 errata [1].
>
> [1] ("https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-4.9/commit/
> drivers/iom
There are scnenarios where drivers are required to make a
scm call in atomic context, such as in one of the qcom's
arm-smmu-500 errata [1].
[1] ("https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/la/kernel/msm-4.9/commit/
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c?h=CogSystems-msm-49/
msm-4.9&id=da765c6c75266b38191b38
