Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents vs. orig_nents misuse

2020-05-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:01 AM Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hi > > On 13.05.2020 15:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I've pushed out a branch with the first three patches here: > > > > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git dma-sg_table-helper > > > > Gitweb: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents vs. orig_nents misuse

2020-05-26 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi On 13.05.2020 15:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I've pushed out a branch with the first three patches here: > > git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git dma-sg_table-helper > > Gitweb: > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents vs. orig_nents misuse

2020-05-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
I've pushed out a branch with the first three patches here: git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git dma-sg_table-helper Gitweb: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dma-sg_table-helper and merged it into the dma-mapping for-next tree. Unless

[PATCH v5 00/38] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents vs. orig_nents misuse

2020-05-13 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Dear All, During the Exynos DRM GEM rework and fixing the issues in the. drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() function [1] I've noticed that most drivers in DRM framework incorrectly use nents and orig_nents entries of the struct sg_table. In case of the most DMA-mapping implementations exchanging