On 17/10/2018 14:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
Now that both sync methods are more or less the same shape, we can save
some code and levels of indirection by rolling them up together again,
with just a couple of simple conditionals to discriminate the MSI and
queue-polling specifics.
Signed-off-by:
On 18/10/2018 12:18, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi John,
On 17/10/18 15:38, John Garry wrote:
On 17/10/2018 14:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
Now that both sync methods are more or less the same shape, we can save
some code and levels of indirection by rolling them up together again,
with just a couple of
Hi John,
On 17/10/18 15:38, John Garry wrote:
On 17/10/2018 14:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
Now that both sync methods are more or less the same shape, we can save
some code and levels of indirection by rolling them up together again,
with just a couple of simple conditionals to discriminate the
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:56:07PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Now that both sync methods are more or less the same shape, we can save
> some code and levels of indirection by rolling them up together again,
> with just a couple of simple conditionals to discriminate the MSI and
> queue-polling
On 17/10/2018 14:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
Now that both sync methods are more or less the same shape, we can save
some code and levels of indirection by rolling them up together again,
with just a couple of simple conditionals to discriminate the MSI and
queue-polling specifics.
Hi Robin, Will,
Now that both sync methods are more or less the same shape, we can save
some code and levels of indirection by rolling them up together again,
with just a couple of simple conditionals to discriminate the MSI and
queue-polling specifics.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy
---
