Hi Xiaolong
On 04/26/2016 03:24 AM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:47:19AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> Hi, Eric
>> Both reported errors related to this series are due to the fact part n
>> has dependency on part n-1.
>>
>
> If I understand correctly, what you meant is tha
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 09:47:19AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>Hi,
>
Hi, Eric
>Both reported errors related to this series are due to the fact part n
>has dependency on part n-1.
>
If I understand correctly, what you meant is that you send patch series
(let's say B), and B has its dependency patch s
Hi,
Both reported errors related to this series are due to the fact part n
has dependency on part n-1.
Does anyone know how to let the 0-day CI robot know about such
dependency between series?
If it is an inconvenience I can put all the patches back into the same
big series, specifying tentative
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/irq/core]
[also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc4 next-20160419]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Eric-Auger/KVM-PCIe-MSI-passthrough-on-ARM-ARM64-ke
This patch handles the iommu mapping of MSI doorbells that require to
be mapped in an iommu domain. This happens on msi_domain_alloc/free_irqs
since this is called in code that can sleep (pci_enable/disable_msi):
iommu_map/unmap is not stated as atomic. On msi_domain_(de)activate and
msi_domain_set
