On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:20:44 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:01:36PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote:
> > Hi Jean,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, I was out last week. Comments inline below.
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:02:47 +0100
> > Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 07:01:36PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Sorry for the delay, I was out last week. Comments inline below.
>
> On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:02:47 +0100
> Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:01:02PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote:
> > > > (
Hi Jean,
Sorry for the delay, I was out last week. Comments inline below.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:02:47 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:01:02PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote:
> > > (1) ACPI has one table per vendor (DMAR for Intel, IVRS for AMD
> > > and IORT for A
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 04:01:02PM -0800, Jacob Pan (Jun) wrote:
> > (1) ACPI has one table per vendor (DMAR for Intel, IVRS for AMD and
> > IORT for Arm). From my point of view IORT is easier to extend, since
> > we just need to introduce a new node type. There are no dependencies
> > to Arm in th
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:00:46AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > (2) In addition, there are some concerns about having virtio depend on
> > ACPI or DT. Some hypervisors (Firecracker, QEMU microvm, kvmtool x86
> > [1])
>
> power?
In kvmtool it boot with device tree. It also doesn't
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:49:47 +0100
Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> I'm seeking feedback on multi-platform support for virtio-iommu. At
> the moment only devicetree (DT) is supported and we don't have a
> pleasant solution for other platforms. Once we figure out the topology
> description, x86 supp
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> I'm seeking feedback on multi-platform support for virtio-iommu. At the
> moment only devicetree (DT) is supported and we don't have a pleasant
> solution for other platforms. Once we figure out the topology
> description, x86
I'm seeking feedback on multi-platform support for virtio-iommu. At the
moment only devicetree (DT) is supported and we don't have a pleasant
solution for other platforms. Once we figure out the topology
description, x86 support is trivial.
Since the IOMMU manages memory accesses from other device