> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:19 PM
>
> On 22/08/17 07:24, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >>> (sorry to pick up this old thread, as the .tex one is not good for review
> >>> and this thread provides necessary background for IOASID).
On 22/08/17 07:24, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> (sorry to pick up this old thread, as the .tex one is not good for review
>>> and this thread provides necessary background for IOASID).
>>>
>>> Hi, Jean,
>>>
>>> I'd like to hear more clarification regarding the relationship between
>>> IOASID and PASID. W
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 8:00 PM
>
> On 21/08/17 08:59, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 11:06 PM
> >> 1. Attach device
> >>
On 21/08/17 08:59, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 11:06 PM
>> 1. Attach device
>>
>>
>> struct virtio_iommu_req_attach {
>> le32address_space;
>> le32devi
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 11:06 PM
> 1. Attach device
>
>
> struct virtio_iommu_req_attach {
> le32address_space;
> le32device;
> le32flags/reserved;
> >>
On 21/04/17 10:02, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 2:46 AM
>>
>> On 18/04/17 11:26, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 3:18 AM
>>> [...]
II. Fe
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 2:46 AM
>
> On 18/04/17 11:26, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
> >> Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 3:18 AM
> >>
> > [...]
> >> II. Feature bits
> >>
> >>
>
On 18/04/17 11:26, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
>> Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 3:18 AM
>>
> [...]
>> II. Feature bits
>>
>>
>> VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_INPUT_RANGE (0)
>> Available range of virtual addresses is described in input_range
>
> Usually only the maximu
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
> Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 3:18 AM
>
[...]
> II. Feature bits
>
>
> VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_INPUT_RANGE (0)
> Available range of virtual addresses is described in input_range
Usually only the maximum supported address bits are important.
Curious d
After the virtio-iommu device has been probed and the driver is aware of
the devices translated by the IOMMU, it can start sending requests to the
virtio-iommu device. The operations described here are voluntarily
minimalistic, so vIOMMU devices can be as simple as possible to implement,
and can be
10 matches
Mail list logo