On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 09:56:54AM +, Makarand Pawagi wrote:
[...]
> > > At a first glance, looks like this could very well fix the ACPI
> > > scenario, but I have some unclarities on the approach:
> > > * are we going to rely in DT and ACPI generic layers even if these
> > > devices are no
; t...@linutronix.de; ja...@lakedaemon.net
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure
> implementation
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On 2020-04-15 4:44 pm, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/14/2020 5:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On 4/15/2020 7:04 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:44:37PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/2020 5:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo
; t...@linutronix.de; ja...@lakedaemon.net
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure
> implementation
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > Hi Lorenzo,
> >
> > On 3/25/2
On 2020-04-15 4:44 pm, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
On 4/14/2020 5:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:44:37PM +0300, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>
>
> On 4/14/2020 5:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> >> Hi Lorenzo,
> >>
> >> On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:
On 4/14/2020 5:32 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>> Hi Lorenzo,
>>
>> On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
From: Laurentiu Tudor
Makarand Pawagi
> > ; Calvin Johnson ;
> > Varun Sethi ; Cristi Sovaiala ;
> > stuart.yo...@arm.com; jeremy.lin...@arm.com; j...@8bytes.org;
> > t...@linutronix.de; ja...@lakedaemon.net
> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure
> > impleme
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
> >> From: Laurentiu Tudor
> >>
> >> The devices on this bus are not discovered by way of
Hi Lorenzo,
On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
>> From: Laurentiu Tudor
>>
>> The devices on this bus are not discovered by way of device tree
>> but by queries to the firmware. It makes little sense to trick t
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, laurentiu.tu...@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Laurentiu Tudor
>
> The devices on this bus are not discovered by way of device tree
> but by queries to the firmware. It makes little sense to trick the
> generic of layer into thinking that these devices are of rel
From: Laurentiu Tudor
The devices on this bus are not discovered by way of device tree
but by queries to the firmware. It makes little sense to trick the
generic of layer into thinking that these devices are of related so
that we can get our dma configuration. Instead of doing that, add
our custo
12 matches
Mail list logo
