please find my comments inline.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 27/03/17 15:34, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>>> it jumps to the parent node without examining the child node.
>>> also with that, it throws "no d
Hi Rob,
On 27/03/17 15:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
>> it jumps to the parent node without examining the child node.
>> also with that, it throws "no dma-ranges found for node"
>> for pci dma-ranges.
>>
>> this patch fixes device node traversing
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Oza Pawandeep wrote:
> it jumps to the parent node without examining the child node.
> also with that, it throws "no dma-ranges found for node"
> for pci dma-ranges.
>
> this patch fixes device node traversing for dma-ranges.
What's the DT look like that doesn't
it jumps to the parent node without examining the child node.
also with that, it throws "no dma-ranges found for node"
for pci dma-ranges.
this patch fixes device node traversing for dma-ranges.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel
Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep
diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of
