On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 09:59:41PM +0100, jroe...@suse.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:01:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This is an artifact of the API being single-instance at the moment.
> > We might not in fact need it, I was just trying to think of things
> > that naturally fit in
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:01:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is an artifact of the API being single-instance at the moment.
> We might not in fact need it, I was just trying to think of things
> that naturally fit in there and that are probably already linked
> together in the individual i
Hi Will,
On Tuesday 02 September 2014 12:03:40 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 29 August 2014 16:54:27 Will Deacon wrote:
[snip]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> > > index f9209666157c..a
On Tuesday 02 September 2014 15:03:14 Varun Sethi wrote:
> Hi Thierry/Will/Arnd,
> Where would the of_xlate callback reside and what would be its function?
>
It is an additional function pointer in iommu_ops and replaces the
add_device callback for IOMMUs that are DT-enabled.
The idea is that w
ll Deacon; jroe...@suse.de; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Thierry
> Reding; laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; Sethi Varun-B16395;
> dw...@infradead.org; hd...@nvidia.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] iommu: provide helper function to configure an
> IOMMU for an of master
>
> O
inux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: a...@arndb.de; dw...@infradead.org; jroe...@suse.de;
> hd...@nvidia.com; Sethi Varun-B16395; thierry.red...@gmail.com;
> laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com; Will Deacon
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/7] iommu: provide helper
On Tuesday 02 September 2014 14:05:08 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 01:15:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'll try to hack something together shortly. I think the proposal
> > > is:
> > >
> > > - Make add_device_master_ids take a generic structure (struct iommu)
>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 01:15:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 September 2014 11:03:42 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:18:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > I don't mind handling PCI devices separately. They are different in a
> > > number
> > > of ways alread
On Tuesday 02 September 2014 11:03:42 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:18:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 01 September 2014 17:40:00 Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thi
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hi Laurent,
> On Friday 29 August 2014 16:54:27 Will Deacon wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > index dd5112265cc9..6d13f962f156 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> > +++ b/driv
Hi Will,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 29 August 2014 16:54:27 Will Deacon wrote:
> The generic IOMMU device-tree bindings can be used to add arbitrary OF
> masters to an IOMMU with a compliant binding.
>
> This patch introduces of_iommu_configure, which does exactly that.
>
> Signed-off-b
On Monday 01 September 2014 16:46:18 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > I think this could use a bit more formalization. As I said in another
> > reply earlier, there's very little standardization in the IOMMU API.
> > That certainly gives us a lot
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 09:18:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2014 17:40:00 Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think this could use a bit
On Monday 01 September 2014 17:40:00 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > I think this could use a bit more formalization. As I said in another
> > > reply earlier, there's ver
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 03:46:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > I think this could use a bit more formalization. As I said in another
> > reply earlier, there's very little standardization in the IOMMU API.
> > That certainly give
On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> I think this could use a bit more formalization. As I said in another
> reply earlier, there's very little standardization in the IOMMU API.
> That certainly gives us a lot of flexibility but it also has the
> downside that it's diffic
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 04:54:27PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> The generic IOMMU device-tree bindings can be used to add arbitrary OF
> masters to an IOMMU with a compliant binding.
>
> This patch introduces of_iommu_configure, which does exactly that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
> ---
> dri
The generic IOMMU device-tree bindings can be used to add arbitrary OF
masters to an IOMMU with a compliant binding.
This patch introduces of_iommu_configure, which does exactly that.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
---
drivers/iommu/Kconfig| 2 +-
drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 36
18 matches
Mail list logo
