On 16/05/2017 15:03, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> Lorenzo made a point that it might be relatively straightforward to just
> follow the IORT mapping for the SMMU through to the ITS MADT entry and
> pull the ITS geometry out of that. It would certainly be nicer to have
> such a helper
John Garry; iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
> a...@vger.kernel.org; de...@acpica.org; Linuxarm; Wangzhou (B);
> Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> Subject: Re: [RFC v1 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable ACPI based HiSilicon
> erra
On 13/05/17 10:47, shameer wrote:
> The HiSilicon erratum 161010801 describes the limitation of HiSilicon
> platforms Hip06/Hip07 to support the SMMU mappings for MSI transactions.
>
> On these platforms GICv3 ITS translator is presented with the deviceID
> by extending the MSI payload data to 64