Re: [PATCH v6 06/20] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Extend MediaTek 4GB Mode

2019-01-31 Thread Evan Green
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:59 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:28 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:57 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > > > MediaTek extend the arm v7s descriptor to support the dram over 4GB. > > > > > > In the mt2712 and mt8173, it's called "4GB

[PATCH 8/9] NTB: Add ntb_msi_test support to ntb_test

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
When the ntb_msi_test module is available, the test code will trigger each of the interrupts and ensure the corresponding occurrences files gets incremented. Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Jon Mason Cc: Dave Jiang Cc: Allen Hubbe --- tools/testing/selftests/ntb/ntb_test.sh | 54

[PATCH 3/9] PCI/switchtec: Add module parameter to request more interrupts

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
Seeing the we want to use more interrupts in the NTB MSI code we need to be able allocate more (sometimes virtual) interrupts in the switchtec driver. Therefore add a module parameter to request to allocate additional interrupts. This puts virtually no limit on the number of MSI interrupts

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:13:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:52:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > *shrug* so what if the special GUP called a VMA op instead of > > > traversing the VMA PTEs today? Why does it really matter? It could > > > easily change to

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 07:02:15PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:13:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:52:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > *shrug* so what if the special GUP called a VMA op instead of > > > > traversing the

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 12:35 p.m., Jerome Glisse wrote: > So what is this O_DIRECT thing that keep coming again and again here :) > What is the use case ? Note that bio will always have valid struct page > of regular memory as using PCIE BAR for filesystem is crazy (you do not > have atomic or cache

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 12:02 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I still think the right direction is to build on what Logan has done - > realize that he created a DMA-only SGL - make that a formal type of > the kernel and provide the right set of APIs to work with this type, > without being forced to expose

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Dave Jiang
On 1/31/2019 11:56 AM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: Hi, This patch series adds optional support for using MSI interrupts instead of NTB doorbells in ntb_transport. This is desirable seeing doorbells on current hardware are quite slow and therefore switching to MSI interrupts provides a significant

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 1:20 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: > Does this work when the system moves the MSI vector either via software > (irqbalance) or BIOS APIC programming (some modes cause round robin > behavior)? I don't know how irqbalance works, and I'm not sure what you are referring to by BIOS APIC

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Dave Jiang
On 1/31/2019 1:48 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: On 2019-01-31 1:20 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: Does this work when the system moves the MSI vector either via software (irqbalance) or BIOS APIC programming (some modes cause round robin behavior)? I don't know how irqbalance works, and I'm not sure

[PATCH 5/9] NTB: Rename ntb.c to support multiple source files in the module

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
The kbuild system does not support having multiple source files in a module if one of those source files has the same name as the module. Therefore, we must rename ntb.c to core.c, while the module remains ntb.ko. This is similar to the way the nvme modules are structured. Signed-off-by: Logan

[PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
Hi, This patch series adds optional support for using MSI interrupts instead of NTB doorbells in ntb_transport. This is desirable seeing doorbells on current hardware are quite slow and therefore switching to MSI interrupts provides a significant performance gain. On switchtec hardware, a simple

[PATCH 1/9] iommu/vt-d: Allow interrupts from the entire bus for aliased devices

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
When a device has multiple aliases that all are from the same bus, we program the IRTE to accept requests from any matching device on the bus. This is so NTB devices which can have requests from multiple bus-devfns can pass MSI interrupts through across the bridge. Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe

[PATCH 6/9] NTB: Introduce MSI library

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
The NTB MSI library allows passing MSI interrupts across a memory window. This offers similar functionality to doorbells or messages except will often have much better latency and the client can potentially use significantly more remote interrupts than typical hardware provides for doorbells.

[PATCH 7/9] NTB: Introduce NTB MSI Test Client

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
Introduce a tool to test NTB MSI interrupts similar to the other NTB test tools. This tool creates a debugfs directory for each NTB device with the following files: port irqX_occurrences peerX/port peerX/count peerX/trigger The 'port' file tells the user the local port number and the

[PATCH 9/9] NTB: Add MSI interrupt support to ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
Introduce the module parameter 'use_msi' which, when set uses MSI interrupts instead of doorbells for each queue pair (QP). T he parameter is only available if NTB MSI support is configured into the kernel. We also require there to be more than one memory window (MW) so that an extra one is

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:35:14PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > Basically invert the API flow - the DMA map would be done close to > > GUP, not buried in the driver. This absolutely doesn't work for every > > flow we have, but it does enable the ones that people seem to care > > about when

Re: [PATCH 2/9] PCI/MSI: Support allocating virtual MSI interrupts

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 3:39 p.m., Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of the series, so: > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas Thanks! >> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h >> index 784fb52b9900..6458ab049852 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/msi.h >> +++

Re: [PATCH 2/9] PCI/MSI: Support allocating virtual MSI interrupts

2019-01-31 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc Thomas, Marc] On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:56:49AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > For NTB devices, we want to be able to trigger MSI interrupts > through a memory window. In these cases we may want to use > more interrupts than the NTB PCI device has available in its MSI-X > table. > > We

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 1:58 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: > > On 1/31/2019 1:48 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> >> On 2019-01-31 1:20 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: >>> Does this work when the system moves the MSI vector either via software >>> (irqbalance) or BIOS APIC programming (some modes cause round robin >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 4:48 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: > > On 1/31/2019 4:41 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: >> >> On 2019-01-31 3:46 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: >>> I believe irqbalance writes to the file /proc/irq/N/smp_affinity. So >>> maybe take a look at the code that starts from there and see if it would >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Dave Jiang
On 1/31/2019 4:41 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: On 2019-01-31 3:46 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: I believe irqbalance writes to the file /proc/irq/N/smp_affinity. So maybe take a look at the code that starts from there and see if it would have any impact on your stuff. Ok, well on my system I can

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Dave Jiang
On 1/31/2019 3:39 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: On 2019-01-31 1:58 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: On 1/31/2019 1:48 PM, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: On 2019-01-31 1:20 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: Does this work when the system moves the MSI vector either via software (irqbalance) or BIOS APIC programming

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Support using MSI interrupts in ntb_transport

2019-01-31 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2019-01-31 3:46 p.m., Dave Jiang wrote: > I believe irqbalance writes to the file /proc/irq/N/smp_affinity. So > maybe take a look at the code that starts from there and see if it would > have any impact on your stuff. Ok, well on my system I can write to the smp_affinity all day and the

Re: fix a layering violation in videobuf2 and improve dma_map_resource v2

2019-01-31 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi All, On 2019-01-18 12:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > this series fixes a rather gross layering violation in videobuf2, which > pokes into arm DMA mapping internals to get a DMA address for memory that > does not have a page structure, and to do so fixes up the dma_map_resource >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/amd: Remove clear_flush_young notifier

2019-01-31 Thread Peter Xu
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:25:40PM +, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On 31/01/2019 07:59, Peter Xu wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:27:40PM +, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > >> Hi Peter, > > > > Hi, Jean, > > > >> > >> On 30/01/2019 05:57, Peter Xu wrote: > >>> AMD IOMMU driver is

Re: [PATCH 2/3] HYPERV/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver

2019-01-31 Thread Tianyu Lan
Hi Vitaly: Thanks for your review. On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:04 PM Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > lantianyu1...@gmail.com writes: > > > From: Lan Tianyu > > > > On the bare metal, enabling X2APIC mode requires interrupt remapping > > function which helps to deliver irq to cpu with

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/Hyper-V: Set x2apic destination mode to physical when x2apic is available

2019-01-31 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:17:31PM +0800, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote: > > This comment needs to be indented one tab or it looks like we're outside the funciton. > +/* > + * Hyper-V doesn't provide irq remapping for IO-APIC. To enable x2apic, > + * set x2apic destination mode to physcial mode

Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range and vm_insert_range_buggy API

2019-01-31 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:43:39PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:38:12AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > > > kernel pages/memory into user vma

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:52:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > *shrug* so what if the special GUP called a VMA op instead of > > traversing the VMA PTEs today? Why does it really matter? It could > > easily change to a struct page flow tomorrow.. > > Well it's so that it's composable. We

Re: [PATCH 3/5] dma: Introduce dma_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> +static inline size_t dma_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev) > +{ > + const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev); > + size_t size = SIZE_MAX; > + > + if (dma_is_direct(ops)) > + size = dma_direct_max_mapping_size(dev); > + else if (ops &&

Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range and vm_insert_range_buggy API

2019-01-31 Thread Souptick Joarder
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 2:09 PM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:38:12AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > > kernel pages/memory into user vma and this was done by > > invoking vm_insert_page() within a loop. > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 01:50:27PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > I do not see how VMA changes are any different than using struct page > in respect to userspace exposure. Those vma callback do not need to be > set by everyone, in fact expectation is that only handful of driver > will set those. >

Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range and vm_insert_range_buggy API

2019-01-31 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 08:38:12AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > kernel pages/memory into user vma and this was done by > invoking vm_insert_page() within a loop. > > As this pattern is common across different drivers, it can > be

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/amd: Remove clear_flush_young notifier

2019-01-31 Thread Peter Xu
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:27:40PM +, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Hi Peter, Hi, Jean, > > On 30/01/2019 05:57, Peter Xu wrote: > > AMD IOMMU driver is using the clear_flush_young() to do cache flushing > > but that's actually already covered by invalidate_range(). Remove the > > extra

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:44:20PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Not really, for MRs most drivers care about DMA addresses only. The > only reason struct page ever gets involved is because it is part of > the GUP, SGL and dma_map family of APIs. And the only way you get the DMA address is

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/Hyper-V: Set x2apic destination mode to physical when x2apic is available

2019-01-31 Thread Tianyu Lan
Hi Greg: Thanks for your review. On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 7:57 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:17:31PM +0800, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Lan Tianyu > > > > Hyper-V doesn't provide irq remapping for IO-APIC. To enable x2apic, > > set x2apic destination

Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range and vm_insert_range_buggy API

2019-01-31 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 13:31:52 CET schrieb Souptick Joarder: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:37 PM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 04:08:12 CET schrieb Souptick Joarder: > > > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > > > kernel pages/memory

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/Hyper-V: Set x2apic destination mode to physical when x2apic is available

2019-01-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:17:31PM +0800, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Lan Tianyu > > Hyper-V doesn't provide irq remapping for IO-APIC. To enable x2apic, > set x2apic destination mode to physcial mode when x2apic is available > and Hyper-V IOMMU driver makes sure cpus assigned with

[PATCH 2/3] HYPERV/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver

2019-01-31 Thread lantianyu1986
From: Lan Tianyu On the bare metal, enabling X2APIC mode requires interrupt remapping function which helps to deliver irq to cpu with 32-bit APIC ID. Hyper-V doesn't provide interrupt remapping function so far and Hyper-V MSI protocol already supports to deliver interrupt to the CPU whose

[PATCH 1/3] x86/Hyper-V: Set x2apic destination mode to physical when x2apic is available

2019-01-31 Thread lantianyu1986
From: Lan Tianyu Hyper-V doesn't provide irq remapping for IO-APIC. To enable x2apic, set x2apic destination mode to physcial mode when x2apic is available and Hyper-V IOMMU driver makes sure cpus assigned with IO-APIC irqs have 8-bit APIC id. Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu ---

[PATCH 0/3] x86/Hyper-V/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V IOMMU driver to support x2apic mode

2019-01-31 Thread lantianyu1986
From: Lan Tianyu On the bare metal, enabling X2APIC mode requires interrupt remapping function which helps to deliver irq to cpu with 32-bit APIC ID. Hyper-V doesn't provide interrupt remapping function so far and Hyper-V MSI protocol already supports to deliver interrupt to the CPU whose

[PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sorry for not noticing last time, but since 5.0 we keep all non-fast > path DMA mapping interfaces out of line, so this should move to > kernel/dma/mapping.c. Okay, attached patch does that. It applies on-top of this patch-set.

Re: [PATCH 2/3] HYPERV/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver

2019-01-31 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:17:32PM +0800, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c > @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > + > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "HYPERV-IR: " fmt Minor nit, you never do any pr_*() calls, so this isn't needed,

Re: [PATCH 2/3] HYPERV/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver

2019-01-31 Thread Tianyu Lan
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 7:59 PM Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:17:32PM +0800, lantianyu1...@gmail.com wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > + > > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "HYPERV-IR: " fmt

Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range and vm_insert_range_buggy API

2019-01-31 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 04:08:12 CET schrieb Souptick Joarder: > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > kernel pages/memory into user vma and this was done by > invoking vm_insert_page() within a loop. > > As this pattern is common across different drivers, it can > be

Re: [PATCHv2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range and vm_insert_range_buggy API

2019-01-31 Thread Souptick Joarder
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:37 PM Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 04:08:12 CET schrieb Souptick Joarder: > > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > > kernel pages/memory into user vma and this was done by > > invoking vm_insert_page() within a loop. > >

Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4

2019-01-31 Thread Christian Zigotzky
Hi Christoph, I compiled kernels for the X5000 and X1000 from your branch 'powerpc-dma.6' today. Gitweb: http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/powerpc-dma.6 git clone git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git -b powerpc-dma.6 a The X1000 and X5000 boot but

Re: [PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Sorry for not noticing last time, but since 5.0 we keep all non-fast > > path DMA mapping interfaces out of line, so this should move to > > kernel/dma/mapping.c.

Re: [PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:01:27PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Sorry for not noticing last time, but since 5.0 we keep all non-fast > > > path DMA

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] iommu: set the default iommu-dma mode as non-strict

2019-01-31 Thread Jean-Philippe Brucker
Hi, On 31/01/2019 13:52, Zhen Lei wrote: > Currently, many peripherals are faster than before. For example, the top > speed of the older netcard is 10Gb/s, and now it's more than 25Gb/s. But > when iommu page-table mapping enabled, it's hard to reach the top speed > in strict mode, because of

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:02:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 01:50:27PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > I do not see how VMA changes are any different than using struct page > > in respect to userspace exposure. Those vma callback do not need to be > > set by

[PATCH RFC 1/1] iommu: set the default iommu-dma mode as non-strict

2019-01-31 Thread Zhen Lei
Currently, many peripherals are faster than before. For example, the top speed of the older netcard is 10Gb/s, and now it's more than 25Gb/s. But when iommu page-table mapping enabled, it's hard to reach the top speed in strict mode, because of frequently map and unmap operations. In order to keep

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:05:01AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 08:44:20PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Not really, for MRs most drivers care about DMA addresses only. The > > only reason struct page ever gets involved is because it is part of > > the GUP, SGL and

[PATCH 1/5] swiotlb: Introduce swiotlb_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel The function returns the maximum size that can be remapped by the SWIOTLB implementation. This function will be later exposed to users through the DMA-API. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel ---

[PATCH 4/5] virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel This function returns the maximum segment size for a single dma transaction of a virtio device. The possible limit comes from the SWIOTLB implementation in the Linux kernel, that has an upper limit of (currently) 256kb of contiguous memory it can map. Other DMA-API

[PATCH 5/5] virtio-blk: Consider virtio_max_dma_size() for maximum segment size

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel Segments can't be larger than the maximum DMA mapping size supported on the platform. Take that into account when setting the maximum segment size for a block device. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel ---

[PATCH 3/5] dma: Introduce dma_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel The function returns the maximum size that can be mapped using DMA-API functions. The patch also adds the implementation for direct DMA and a new dma_map_ops pointer so that other implementations can expose their limit. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH] dma: Uninline dma_max_mapping_size()

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:43:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > OK. Joerg can you repost the series with this squashed > and all acks applied? Sure, sent out now as v6. Regards, Joerg ___ iommu mailing list

[PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi, here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous versions can be found here: V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-j...@8bytes.org/ V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-j...@8bytes.org/ V3:

Re: [PATCH v5 11/20] iommu/mediatek: Move vld_pa_rng into plat_data

2019-01-31 Thread Evan Green
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:20 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:30 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:58 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > > > Both mt8173 and mt8183 don't have this vld_pa_rng(valid physical address > > > range) register while mt2712 have. Move it into

[PATCH 2/5] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel This function will be used from dma_direct code to determine the maximum segment size of a dma mapping. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel --- include/linux/swiotlb.h | 6 ++ kernel/dma/swiotlb.c| 9

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm/vma: add support for peer to peer to device vma

2019-01-31 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:13:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 03:52:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > *shrug* so what if the special GUP called a VMA op instead of > > > traversing the VMA PTEs today? Why does it really matter? It could > > > easily change to

[PATCH] swiotlb: Return error from swiotlb_init_with_tbl()

2019-01-31 Thread Joerg Roedel
From: Joerg Roedel The only reason why swiotlb_init_with_tbl() can fail is an allocation failure in the memblock_alloc() function. But this function just calls panic() in case it can't fulfill the request and never returns an error, therefore swiotlb_init_with_tbl() also never actually returns

Re: [PATCH 3/3] videobuf2: replace a layering violation with dma_map_resource

2019-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Hi Marek, can chance you could retest the v2 version? ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: [PATCH 2/3] HYPERV/IOMMU: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver

2019-01-31 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
lantianyu1...@gmail.com writes: > From: Lan Tianyu > > On the bare metal, enabling X2APIC mode requires interrupt remapping > function which helps to deliver irq to cpu with 32-bit APIC ID. > Hyper-V doesn't provide interrupt remapping function so far and Hyper-V > MSI protocol already supports

Re: [PATCH v5 17/20] memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of need_larbid

2019-01-31 Thread Evan Green
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 7:22 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:11 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > > > The "mediatek,larb-id" has already been parsed in MTK IOMMU driver. > > > It's no need to parse it again in SMI driver. Only