Re: [RFC 4/4] drm: Add NVIDIA Tegra support

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: * Sascha Hauer wrote: You might want to have a look at the sdrm patches I recently posted to dri-devel and arm Linux Kernel. Among other things they allow to register crtcs/connectors/encoders seperately so

Re: [Bugfix]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Jiang Liu jiang@linux.intel.com wrote: Hi Alexander, Mark, Alex, Could you please help to apply the debug patch and send me back the dmesg? Please also help to turn kernel paramemter apic=debug. See attached. Thanks, Alex Hi Mark, It

Re: amd-iommu: can't boot with amdgpu, AMD-Vi: Completion-Wait loop timed out

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Deucher, Alexander > wrote: >> > We are unable to boot Acer Aspire E5-553G (AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7) nor >> > Acer Aspire E5-523 with standard

Re: [PATCH] fix double ;;s in code

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:03 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Pavel Machek wrote: >> On Mon 2018-02-19 16:41:35, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Yeah, pls split this into one patch per area, with a suitable patch >>> subject prefix. Look at git

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] pci/p2p: add a function to test peer to peer capability

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:25 PM Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On 2019-01-29 12:56 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:47 PM wrote: > >> > >> From: Jérôme Glisse > >> > >> device_test_p2p() return true if two devices

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] pci/p2p: add a function to test peer to peer capability

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:47 PM wrote: > > From: Jérôme Glisse > > device_test_p2p() return true if two devices can peer to peer to > each other. We add a generic function as different inter-connect > can support peer to peer and we want to genericaly test this no > matter what the

Re: [PATCH 19/28] gpu/drm: remove the powerpc hack in drm_legacy_sg_alloc

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 5:41 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:54 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 14:25 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:59:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > If this code was broken for

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Convert the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:56 AM Tom Murphy wrote: > > Hi Logan/All, > > I have added a check for the sg_dma_len == 0 : > """ > } __sgt_iter(struct scatterlist *sgl, bool dma) { > struct sgt_iter s = { .sgp = sgl }; > > + if (sgl && sg_dma_len(sgl) == 0) > + s.sgp = NULL;

Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH v5 05/38] drm: prime: use sgtable iterators in drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays()

PU fixes for v5.9 in the queue? Maybe you can add > that patch to the queue? Dave: would it be okay that way? I think this should go into drm-misc for 5.9 since it's an update to drm_prime.c. Is that patch ready to merge? Acked-by: Alex Deucher Alex > > Best regards > --

Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdkfd: fix build error with AMD_IOMMU_V2=m

On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 12:55 PM Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > Hi Felix, > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:30:19AM -0500, Felix Kuehling wrote: > > > I think the proper fix would be to not rely on custom hooks into a > > > particular > > > IOMMU driver, but to instead ensure that the amdgpu