On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 at 13:47, David Virag wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 00:48 +0300, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> [...]
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > As I understand, you have some board with SysMMU v7, which is not VM
> > capable (judging from the patches you shared earlier). Could you
> > please somehow
On Sun, 2022-07-03 at 00:48 +0300, Sam Protsenko wrote:
[...]
> Hi Marek,
>
> As I understand, you have some board with SysMMU v7, which is not VM
> capable (judging from the patches you shared earlier). Could you
> please somehow verify if this series works fine for you? For example,
> this
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 at 00:37, Sam Protsenko wrote:
>
> Existing exynos-iommu driver only supports SysMMU versions up to v5. But
> it's pretty much ready for basic usage with SysMMU v7, only small
> changes have to be done. As SysMMU version is tested dynamically (by
> reading the corresponding
Existing exynos-iommu driver only supports SysMMU versions up to v5. But
it's pretty much ready for basic usage with SysMMU v7, only small
changes have to be done. As SysMMU version is tested dynamically (by
reading the corresponding register), there is no need to introduce new
compatible string.
