On 2021-08-03 01:09, Rajat Jain wrote:
Hi Robin, Doug,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:14 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:07 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-07-08 15:36, Doug Anderson wrote:
[...]
Or document for the users that want performance how to
change the setting,
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 5:09 PM Rajat Jain wrote:
>
> Hi Robin, Doug,
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:14 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:07 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2021-07-08 15:36, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > >> Or document
Hi Robin, Doug,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 8:14 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:07 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-07-08 15:36, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > [...]
> > >> Or document for the users that want performance how to
> > >> change the setting, so that they
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:07 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 2021-07-08 15:36, Doug Anderson wrote:
> [...]
> >> Or document for the users that want performance how to
> >> change the setting, so that they can decide.
> >
> > Pushing this to the users can make sense for a Linux distribution
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 11:29:08AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> As mentioned yesterday, already done! I'm hoping to be able to post the
> patches next week after some testing :)
Great, looking forward to your patches :-)
___
iommu mailing list
On 2021-07-14 11:15, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 02:56:47PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
As I mentioned before, conceptually I think this very much belongs in sysfs
as a user decision. We essentially have 4 levels of "strictness":
1: DMA domain with bounce pages
2: DMA
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 02:56:47PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> As I mentioned before, conceptually I think this very much belongs in sysfs
> as a user decision. We essentially have 4 levels of "strictness":
>
> 1: DMA domain with bounce pages
> 2: DMA domain
> 3: DMA domain with flush
On 2021-07-08 15:36, Doug Anderson wrote:
[...]
Or document for the users that want performance how to
change the setting, so that they can decide.
Pushing this to the users can make sense for a Linux distribution but
probably less sense for an embedded platform. So I'm happy to make
some way
On 2021-07-08 09:08, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:00:13PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
a) Nothing is inherently broken with my current approach.
b) My current approach doesn't make anybody terribly upset even if
nobody is totally in love with it.
Well, no, sorry :)
I don't
On 2021-07-08 09:08, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:00:13PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
a) Nothing is inherently broken with my current approach.
b) My current approach doesn't make anybody terribly upset even if
nobody is totally in love with it.
Well, no, sorry :)
I don't
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:09 AM Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:00:13PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > a) Nothing is inherently broken with my current approach.
> >
> > b) My current approach doesn't make anybody terribly upset even if
> > nobody is totally in love with
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:00:13PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> a) Nothing is inherently broken with my current approach.
>
> b) My current approach doesn't make anybody terribly upset even if
> nobody is totally in love with it.
Well, no, sorry :)
I don't think it is a good idea to allow
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:42 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Joerg Roedel wrote:
> >
> > Hi Douglas,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:17:56AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > The goal of this patch series is to get better SD/MMC performance on
> > >
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:19 AM Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
> Hi Douglas,
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:17:56AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > The goal of this patch series is to get better SD/MMC performance on
> > Qualcomm eMMC controllers and in generally nudge us forward on the
> > path
Hi Douglas,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:17:56AM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The goal of this patch series is to get better SD/MMC performance on
> Qualcomm eMMC controllers and in generally nudge us forward on the
> path of allowing some devices to be in strict mode and others to be in
>
The goal of this patch series is to get better SD/MMC performance on
Qualcomm eMMC controllers and in generally nudge us forward on the
path of allowing some devices to be in strict mode and others to be in
non-strict mode. This patch series doesn't save the world but
hopefully at least moves us
16 matches
Mail list logo
