On Wed, 2022-02-16 at 14:59 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:55 PM Yong Wu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 12:08 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> > wrote:
> > > Il 25/01/22 09:56, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > > > No need zero for the protect buffer that is only accessed
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:55 PM Yong Wu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 12:08 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 25/01/22 09:56, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > > No need zero for the protect buffer that is only accessed by the
> > > IOMMU HW
> > > translation fault happened.
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 12:08 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 25/01/22 09:56, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > No need zero for the protect buffer that is only accessed by the
> > IOMMU HW
> > translation fault happened.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu
>
> I would rather keep this a
Il 25/01/22 09:56, Yong Wu ha scritto:
No need zero for the protect buffer that is only accessed by the IOMMU HW
translation fault happened.
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu
I would rather keep this a devm_kzalloc instead... the cost is very minimal and
this will be handy when new hardware will be
No need zero for the protect buffer that is only accessed by the IOMMU HW
translation fault happened.
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu
---
drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
index
