Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks

2022-07-01 Thread Baolu Lu

On 2022/7/1 15:53, Tian, Kevin wrote:

From: Lu Baolu 
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 3:47 PM

v3:
  - Split reduction of lock ranges from changing irqsave.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
iommu/BN9PR11MB52760A3D7C6BF1AF9C9D34658CAA9@BN9PR11MB5276.
namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
  - Fully initialize the dev_info before adding it to the list.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
iommu/BN9PR11MB52764D7CD86448C5E4EB46668CAA9@BN9PR11MB5276.
namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
  - Various code and comments refinement.



This doesn't say why original patch2 was removed:

"iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain()"

It took me a while to realize that it's already covered by your another
patch fixing RID2PASID. 


My fault! I forgot to mention it in the change log. Sorry about it.

Best regards,
baolu
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

RE: [PATCH v3 00/11] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks

2022-07-01 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Lu Baolu 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 3:47 PM
> 
> v3:
>  - Split reduction of lock ranges from changing irqsave.
>https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> iommu/BN9PR11MB52760A3D7C6BF1AF9C9D34658CAA9@BN9PR11MB5276.
> namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
>  - Fully initialize the dev_info before adding it to the list.
>https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> iommu/BN9PR11MB52764D7CD86448C5E4EB46668CAA9@BN9PR11MB5276.
> namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
>  - Various code and comments refinement.
> 

This doesn't say why original patch2 was removed:

"iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain()"

It took me a while to realize that it's already covered by your another
patch fixing RID2PASID. 
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu