Hi,
On 3/9/19 7:49 PM, James Sewart wrote:
Hey Lu,
On 9 Mar 2019, at 01:53, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi James,
On 3/9/19 12:57 AM, James Sewart wrote:
Hey Lu,
On 8 Mar 2019, at 03:09, Lu Baolu wrote:
Do you mind if I work on top of your patches for further cleanups and
sign off a v2 together
Hey Lu,
> On 8 Mar 2019, at 03:09, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> On 3/7/19 6:21 PM, James Sewart wrote:
>> Hey Lu,
>>> On 7 Mar 2019, at 06:31, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> On 3/7/19 2:08 AM, James Sewart wrote:
- /*
- * For each rmrr
-
Hi James,
On 3/7/19 6:21 PM, James Sewart wrote:
Hey Lu,
On 7 Mar 2019, at 06:31, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi James,
On 3/7/19 2:08 AM, James Sewart wrote:
- /*
-* For each rmrr
-* for each dev attached to rmrr
-* do
-* locate drhd for dev, alloc
Hi,
On 3/7/19 6:21 PM, James Sewart wrote:
Hey Lu,
On 7 Mar 2019, at 06:31, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi James,
On 3/7/19 2:08 AM, James Sewart wrote:
- /*
-* For each rmrr
-* for each dev attached to rmrr
-* do
-* locate drhd for dev, alloc domain for
Hey Lu,
> On 7 Mar 2019, at 06:31, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> On 3/7/19 2:08 AM, James Sewart wrote:
>> -/*
>> - * For each rmrr
>> - * for each dev attached to rmrr
>> - * do
>> - * locate drhd for dev, alloc domain
Hi James,
On 3/7/19 2:08 AM, James Sewart wrote:
- /*
-* For each rmrr
-* for each dev attached to rmrr
-* do
-* locate drhd for dev, alloc domain for dev
-* allocate free domain
-* allocate page table entries for rmrr
-
Hey,
> On 6 Mar 2019, at 07:00, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 3/5/19 7:46 PM, James Sewart wrote:
>> Hey Lu,
>>> On 5 Mar 2019, at 06:59, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's hard for me to understand why do we remove the rmrr related
>>> code in this patch.
>> The RMRR code removed
Hi,
On 3/5/19 7:46 PM, James Sewart wrote:
Hey Lu,
On 5 Mar 2019, at 06:59, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi,
It's hard for me to understand why do we remove the rmrr related
code in this patch.
The RMRR code removed here requires the lazy allocation of domains to
exist, as it is run before iommu.c
Hey Lu,
> On 5 Mar 2019, at 06:59, Lu Baolu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's hard for me to understand why do we remove the rmrr related
> code in this patch.
The RMRR code removed here requires the lazy allocation of domains to
exist, as it is run before iommu.c would assign IOMMU groups and attach
Hi,
It's hard for me to understand why do we remove the rmrr related
code in this patch.
And, now we have two places to hold a domain for a device: group and
dev->info. We can consider to optimize the use of per device iommu
arch data. This should be later work anyway.
More comments inline.
10 matches
Mail list logo