Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Change System MMU platform device definitions

2012-04-10 Thread Kukjin Kim
Joerg Roedel wrote: On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote: Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up 1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of some samsung topic stuff. Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree,

Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Change System MMU platform device definitions

2012-03-19 Thread Subash Patel
Hi KyongHo, Kukjin, On 03/15/2012 08:09 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: On 03/15/12 04:12, Joerg Roedel wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote: KyongHo, I looked at 'Cho KyongHo pullip.cho ...' and 'KyongHo Cho pullip.cho ...' in this series, which one do you want to use?

Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Change System MMU platform device definitions

2012-03-18 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:47:50PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote: Anyway Joerg, how do you want to handle this? Do you want to pick up 1/2/3 all of them in your tree? If so, 2nd patch should be on top of some samsung topic stuff. Since patch 2 only applies to the Samsung tree, it is best to

Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Change System MMU platform device definitions

2012-03-15 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:32:39PM +0900, Cho KyongHo wrote: Handling System MMUs with an identifier is not flexible to manage System MMU platform devices because of the following reasons: 1. A device driver which needs to handle System MMU must know the ID. 2. A System MMU may not present in