On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 08:46:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > This is why release must do invalidate all - but it doesn't need to do
> > any more - as no SPTE can be established without a mmget() - and
> > mmget() is no
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is why release must do invalidate all - but it doesn't need to do
> any more - as no SPTE can be established without a mmget() - and
> mmget() is no longer possible past release.
Maybe we should rename the release method to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 07:49:29PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:42:39PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 05:15:19PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:52:45AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 01:42:39PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 05:15:19PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:52:45AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:35:56PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > On
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 05:15:19PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:52:45AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:35:56PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:52:45AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:35:56PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:56:14AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > I
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 03:35:56PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:56:14AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > I tried to keep it simple like that: normally mmu_notifier_get() is called
> >
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:56:14AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > I tried to keep it simple like that: normally mmu_notifier_get() is called
> > in bind(), and mmu_notifier_put() is called in unbind().
> >
> > Multiple
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 10:56:14AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> I tried to keep it simple like that: normally mmu_notifier_get() is called
> in bind(), and mmu_notifier_put() is called in unbind().
>
> Multiple device drivers may call bind() with the same mm. Each bind()
> calls
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:13:40AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 04:04:27PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:48:44AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:39:35PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > > > +
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 07:23:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> -static struct mmu_notifier *gru_alloc_notifier(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +static struct mmu_notifier *gru_alloc_notifier(struct mm_struct *mm, void
> *privdata)
Pleae don't introduce any > 80 char lines. Not here, and not
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 04:04:27PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:48:44AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:39:35PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(bond, _mm->devices, mm_head) {
> > > > > +
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:48:44AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:39:35PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(bond, _mm->devices, mm_head) {
> > > > + /*
> > > > +* To ensure that we observe the
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:39:35PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(bond, _mm->devices, mm_head) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * To ensure that we observe the initialization of io_mm fields
> > > + * by io_mm_finalize() before the registration of
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:08:14AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:00:56PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 07:23:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > The
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:24:39AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:00:56PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 07:23:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > The new allocation scheme introduced by 2c7933f53f6b ("mm/mmu_notifiers:
> > >
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:00:56PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 07:23:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > The new allocation scheme introduced by 2c7933f53f6b ("mm/mmu_notifiers:
> > add a get/put scheme for the registration") provides a convenient way
> > for
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 07:23:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> The new allocation scheme introduced by 2c7933f53f6b ("mm/mmu_notifiers:
> add a get/put scheme for the registration") provides a convenient way
> for users to attach notifier data to an mm. However, it would be even
> better
18 matches
Mail list logo
