ssage-
From: marc.herb...@gmail.com [mailto:marc.herb...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marc
Herbert
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:07 PM
To: Feghali, Jose
Cc: iperf-us...@dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf UDP Packet Loss
2010/2/16 Feghali, Jose :
> That may well be the case -
2010/2/16 Feghali, Jose :
> That may well be the case – but FWIW, when I was testing DVTS with the
> University of São Paulo last year, we consistently got huge packet loss
> reported by iperf depending on the settings and which Iperf version we used.
> Linux iperf versions did not give the same r
m: Aaron Brown [mailto:aa...@internet2.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 7:56 AM
To: Wichai Komentrakarn
Cc: iperf-us...@dast.nlanr.net
Subject: Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf UDP Packet Loss
On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Wichai Komentrakarn wrote:
I am trying to use the Iperf to analyze UDP packet loss o
On Feb 14, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Wichai Komentrakarn wrote:
> I am trying to use the Iperf to analyze UDP packet loss on a network. I saw
> Iperf reported several % packet loss but when I used Wireshark to capture the
> sent and received packets and compared them. I couldn't see any packets loss
>
UDP Packet Loss
Hi,
I am trying to use the Iperf to analyze UDP packet loss on a network. I saw
Iperf reported several % packet loss but when I used Wireshark to capture the
sent and received packets and compared them. I couldn't see any packets loss on
the received side. Can you explai
Hi,
I am trying to use the Iperf to analyze UDP packet loss on a network. I saw
Iperf reported several % packet loss but when I used Wireshark to capture the
sent and received packets and compared them. I couldn't see any packets loss on
the received side. Can you explain how Iperf reported per
