Re: [Iperf-users] When will real UDP, connectionless (sendto(), recvfrom(), broadcast) be iperf'd?

2017-01-13 Thread Bob McMahon
...@broadcom.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2017 1:15 PM > *To:* Hoshall, Paul > *Cc:* iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net; Gibbs, James > *Subject:* Re: [Iperf-users] When will real UDP, connectionless > (sendto(), recvfrom(), broadcast) be iperf'd? > > > > Which version

Re: [Iperf-users] When will real UDP, connectionless (sendto(), recvfrom(), broadcast) be iperf'd?

2017-01-13 Thread Hoshall, Paul
@lists.sourceforge.net; Gibbs, James Subject: Re: [Iperf-users] When will real UDP, connectionless (sendto(), recvfrom(), broadcast) be iperf'd? Not sure why this is needed. I think a UDP socket with bind() using send() is equivalent to sendto() with respect to both being connectionless at the network layer

Re: [Iperf-users] When will real UDP, connectionless (sendto(), recvfrom(), broadcast) be iperf'd?

2017-01-12 Thread Bob McMahon
Not sure why this is needed. I think a UDP socket with bind() using send() is equivalent to sendto() with respect to both being connectionless at the network layer. Are you trying to test system or OS calls? If not, I think a bind for UDP should be fine. Bob On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:06 PM,