Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Joe Hewitt has handed off the iUI code without any Facebook improvements. Christopher Allen and I have been working on the iUI Google Code site and have made a release available there for download . This release is

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Hi, does anyone have any new info on this subject? Anyone heard if the new improvements that came out of the facebook iphone app will be implemented to any extent in the IUI? cheers Pelle On Oct 8, 10:56 pm, RobG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 9, 5:04 am, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

On Oct 9, 5:04 am, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Allen wrote: > > > Joe, thanks for getting back with us. > > > How do you suggest we should proceed? Should we pick a new name for > > the project (a true fork), or take over administering the google code > > pages you've al

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Christopher Allen wrote: > > Joe, thanks for getting back with us. > > How do you suggest we should proceed? Should we pick a new name for > the project (a true fork), or take over administering the google code > pages you've already started? My vote is for keeping the name and using Google code

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

I'd also like to see more development on iUI, and would love to participate in the community. Just sharing my two cents. On Oct 5, 11:54 am, "Christopher Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/4/07, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does it make sense to create them, and move de

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

On 10/5/07, Joe Hewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry I've been neglecting iUI for so long. I would say that if there > are people who would like to fork iUI, they have my blessing. I don't > think I'll be able to put significant time into iUI in the near future > and I don't want to block p

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Sorry I've been neglecting iUI for so long. I would say that if there are people who would like to fork iUI, they have my blessing. I don't think I'll be able to put significant time into iUI in the near future and I don't want to block people who depend on the library for their projects. --~-

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

On 10/4/07, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it make sense to create them, and move detailed iUI discussion off > this list? Is there critical mass for iUI to be a > maintained/supported/developed open source project? It seems as if Joe > Hewitt has been completely swamped by hi

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Thanks, Christopher. Does it make sense to create them, and move detailed iUI discussion off this list? Is there critical mass for iUI to be a maintained/supported/developed open source project? It seems as if Joe Hewitt has been completely swamped by his (impressive) work at Facebook. A

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Thanks for the clarification! (I'm relieved as I'm testing with the non-prototype.js version and it seems to be working well) -- Sean RobG wrote: > > On Oct 5, 10:57 am, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> RobG wrote: >> > [...] > >>> Due to the above, I wouldn't use eithe

Re: iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

On 10/3/07, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there user and/or developer lists for iUI other than this list? Not that I know of. -- Christopher Allen --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

On Oct 5, 10:57 am, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RobG wrote: [...] > > Due to the above, I wouldn't use either. > > Actually the above doesn't explain why wouldn't use the non-prototype > version. Why wouldn't you use that one? "Either" being prototype.js or scriptaculous.js. If

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Thanks, Rob. Question below... RobG wrote: > > The non-Prototype.js library is a bit bigger (10kB vs 5kB). The one > requiring Prototype.js also requires scriptaculous.js and effects.js, > so while you save 5kB for iUI, you need another 140k of libraries to > support it. > > You might get some

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Thanks, I made some minor updates to the iUI page on that wiki, but what I'm really looking to do is to help get some "official" documentation for iUI on the "official" site. Putting documentation here would be just one more place that might have a "different" story. It seems like the right pl

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

You can always post to the iPhone Developers' Wiki http://www.kudit.com/wiki/ On Oct 3, 4:20 pm, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I volunteer to create a page on the iUI wiki on Google Code if given a > wiki account and an email with information as to which version is which. > > -- Sea

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

On Oct 3, 3:23 pm, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There also appear to be two versions of iui within the SVN repository: >* one in iui/js/iui.js (requires prototype.js) >* one in iui/iui/iui.js (doesn't require prototype.js) > > Does anyone know what the exact differences be

iUI users and developer's lists? (was Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Are there user and/or developer lists for iUI other than this list? -- Sean Ejeklint wrote: > I agree, it's quite confusing. Especially for newbies like me, so if > someone who knows better could clean-up and/or add information it > would be much appreciated. > > All the best! > > Per > > On 3 Ok

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

I volunteer to create a page on the iUI wiki on Google Code if given a wiki account and an email with information as to which version is which. -- Sean Ejeklint wrote: > I agree, it's quite confusing. Especially for newbies like me, so if > someone who knows better could clean-up and/or add in

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

I agree, it's quite confusing. Especially for newbies like me, so if someone who knows better could clean-up and/or add information it would be much appreciated. All the best! Per On 3 Okt, 07:23, Sean Gilligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There also appear to be two versions of iui within the

Re: svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

There also appear to be two versions of iui within the SVN repository: * one in iui/js/iui.js (requires prototype.js) * one in iui/iui/iui.js (doesn't require prototype.js) Does anyone know what the exact differences between these two are? Are there any guidelines as to which one should

svn repository vs. joe hewitt's download

Noticed that joe hewitt has a link to iui code, as well as a link to the google project hosting an svn repository. Which is more up to date? Or, is there a reason to have both? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to t