On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:10:06AM -0400, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
From: Zdenek Styblik zdenek.styb...@gmail.com
However, changes to ipmi_lanp.{c,h} aren't as discussed 5 months
ago, because they replace one, resp. existing, OEM functionality
with another.
Were you able to locate the OEM
0001-Re-work-of-ipmi_ek_display_fru_header_detail.patch
This looks ok... It's not necessary to change
ipmi_ek_display_fru_header_detail to return int, especially since you
don't check the return code at all. Also the added storing of the
return code for fseek at the bottom, but not checking the
Hi,
attached is a patch to mitigate possible int *flows via user input.
It's pretty much no brainer except those shifts. Therefore I'd
appreciate if somebody could give it a look.
Are those shifts correct?
Will they work correctly on big endian too?
Thanks,
Z.
ipmi_dcmi.c-fix_flows.diff
