On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 11:47 +0800, Chun Tian (binghe) wrote:
> Hi, developer
>
> Does IPMItool have any UDP retransmit support? What happened if some
> UDP packets lost when communication to remote BMC?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chun Tian (binghe)
Hi,
I'm afraid I don't know right off - I would have
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 08:36 -0400, Al Chu wrote:
>
> Hey Carol,
>
> > Concerns went beyond that of a remote user unintentionally wreaking
> > havoc (although that was brought up ;-}. One main issue is that the
> > watchdog timer is simply not safe to be used in the remote manner
> > suggested -
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 12:09 -0700, Carol Hebert wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 18:54 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> > Hey Carol,
> >
>
> > I might be missing something here. But how would the watchdog commands
> > be any more dangerous than ipmi commands for a power cycle or changing
> > boot configura
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 18:54 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> Hey Carol,
>
> I might be missing something here. But how would the watchdog commands
> be any more dangerous than ipmi commands for a power cycle or changing
> boot configuration? Is the feeling a user would have a greater
> likelihood of not
Hi, developer
Does IPMItool have any UDP retransmit support? What happened if some
UDP packets lost when communication to remote BMC?
Regards,
Chun Tian (binghe)
在 2008-5-2，上午4:49， Carol Hebert 写道：
Hi,
First, please let me apologize for not having the 1.8.10
patch-and-outstanding-issues
Hey Carol,
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 17:09 -0700, Carol Hebert wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 16:11 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> > Hey Carol,
> >
> > > As you may recall, during the
> > > watchdog discussion several months back, we'd decided that full watchdog
> > > "set" command support is too dangerous a
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 16:11 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> Hey Carol,
>
> > As you may recall, during the
> > watchdog discussion several months back, we'd decided that full watchdog
> > "set" command support is too dangerous and we subsequently had some
> > patches pulled from the cvs tree which allowed
Hey Carol,
> As you may recall, during the
> watchdog discussion several months back, we'd decided that full watchdog
> "set" command support is too dangerous and we subsequently had some
> patches pulled from the cvs tree which allowed that functionality.
I missed the original thread and may not
Hi,
First, please let me apologize for not having the 1.8.10
patch-and-outstanding-issues list completed yet. I had a series of
crises to deal with since I posted my intent to get started on this and
so was delayed. However, all that is behind me now (knock on wood ;-)
and I'm now back to workin
