Corey Minyard wrote:
>Benoit Guillon wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, I understand that the watchdog is not provided for that. I've had a
>>confirmation by the vendor: the boards do not support those chassis
>>commands. What is not clear to me is what the term "chassis" should
>>cover. In my case I've sever
Benoit Guillon wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I understand that the watchdog is not provided for that. I've had a
> confirmation by the vendor: the boards do not support those chassis
> commands. What is not clear to me is what the term "chassis" should
> cover. In my case I've several compact pci blades in
Carol Hebert wrote:
> Quoting Benoit Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Carol Hebert wrote:
>
> ..
>
>>>
>>> Regarding out-of-band watchdog manipulation, of course it's not a good
>>> idea for a remote machine to be made responsible for resetting a
>>> watchdog timer on any another machine.
>>>
>>
Quoting Benoit Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Carol Hebert wrote:
>
..
>>
>> Regarding out-of-band watchdog manipulation, of course it's not a good
>> idea for a remote machine to be made responsible for resetting a
>> watchdog timer on any another machine.
>>
> It depends on the capabilities of t
Benoit Guillon wrote:
> Corey Minyard wrote:
>
>> Benoit Guillon wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Doug Ambrisko wrote:
>>>
>>> Indeed, the /dev/watchdog should be used when the watchdog is
>>> locally armed. The goal here is to remotely start it on another
>>> board (for instance to power off the board when th
Carol Hebert wrote:
>On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 08:45 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
>
>
>>Audet, Jean-Michel writes:
>>| Are we OK if I patch IPMITool in the CVS.
>>
>>Patch it. There are probably some OS's that don't have it built into
>>the driver. It won't conflict unless people try to do both at
Corey Minyard wrote:
>Benoit Guillon wrote:
>
>
>>Doug Ambrisko wrote:
>>
>>Indeed, the /dev/watchdog should be used when the watchdog is locally
>>armed. The goal here is to remotely start it on another board (for
>>instance to power off the board when there is no PICMG extension like
>>"f
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 08:45 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> Audet, Jean-Michel writes:
> | Are we OK if I patch IPMITool in the CVS.
>
> Patch it. There are probably some OS's that don't have it built into
> the driver. It won't conflict unless people try to do both at once.
> We might want to a
Benoit Guillon wrote:
> Doug Ambrisko wrote:
>
> Indeed, the /dev/watchdog should be used when the watchdog is locally
> armed. The goal here is to remotely start it on another board (for
> instance to power off the board when there is no PICMG extension like
> "fru crontrol" available).
>
Doug Ambrisko wrote:
>Benoit Guillon writes:
>| Hello,
>|
>| Strangely enough, ipmitool does not provide the watchdog commands. Here
>| is an uncomplete implementation. The feature is handy for resetting
>| remote boards when there is no other way to do so.
>
>This isn't a bad thing to implemen
ed
watchdog if available.
Doug A.
| -Message d'origine-
| De?: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Doug Ambrisko
| Envoy??: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:27 AM
| ??: Benoit Guillon
| Cc?: ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
| Objet?: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Watchdog
Benoit Guillon writes:
| Hello,
|
| Strangely enough, ipmitool does not provide the watchdog commands. Here
| is an uncomplete implementation. The feature is handy for resetting
| remote boards when there is no other way to do so.
This isn't a bad thing to implement and is a good feature, howev
12 matches
Mail list logo
