[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes that is what the spec says, but reality is always somewhat
different. There is no technical reason that an anycast address could
not be assigned to any group of hosts. The issue that must be dealt with
there are technical reasons why anycast addresses can only be a
>Yes that is what the spec says, but reality is always somewhat
>different. There is no technical reason that an anycast address could
>not be assigned to any group of hosts. The issue that must be dealt with
there are technical reasons why anycast addresses can only be assigned
to
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Oops...
>
> I made a mistake in the response. An anycast address can
> only be assigned to a router (an IPv6 node that forwards
> packets), not to a host.
>
> So, most Web Servers could not be assigned an anycast address.
>
Yes that is what the spec says, but real
Oops...
I made a mistake in the response. An anycast address can only
be assigned to a router (an IPv6 node that forwards packets), not
to a host.
So, most Web Servers could not be assigned an anycast address.
Sorry,
Margaret
At 08:28 AM 1/22/2003 -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi Digama
Hi Digamar,
Sorry for not replying earlier.
I have read the RFC reagrding the addressing in IPv6 and I understood that
Web servers , routers , load balancers, Gateways and Switches can have
either Unicast or Multicast or Anycast address.
Any IPv6 node can have any of these types of addresses
Hi
I am developing a Web server , router , load balancers, Gateway and Switch
testing software.
I have read the RFC reagrding the addressing in IPv6 and I understood that
Web servers , routers , load balancers, Gateways and Switches can have
either Unicast or Multicast or Anycast address.
I am
