pasi.ero...@nokia.com writes:
- A question: did the WG discuss the pros and cons of integrity
protecting the WESP header? (This does make WESP more complex to
implement, and currently the WESP header does not contain any data
that would benefit from integrity protection in any way.)
Thats is
David Wierbowski writes:
Thanks for the clarification. The text in 4301 makes sense. What I do not
agree with is the text in 4945 that requires implementations MUST be able
to perform matching based on a bitwise comparison of the entire DN in ID to
its entry in the SPD. I can agree with
Paul Hoffman writes:
At 10:03 PM +0300 9/12/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
The ipsecme WG will have a virtual interim WG meeting in about a month. We
will have a conference call on Tuesday September 22, 15:00 GMT (18:00
Israel, 17:00 CET, 11:00 EDT, 8:00 PDT), for 2 hours. We are planning on
HI,
I have a query about the Sequence number in the ESP Header.
If for any packet, the receiver finds the seq number as ZERO, what is the
desired behavior..?
Should this result in the anti-replay check failure..?
Should this be treated as a corrupted packet..?
Appreciate your inputs.
Thanks
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:35:32AM -0500, Manish Aggarwal wrote:
HI,
I have a query about the Sequence number in the ESP Header.
If for any packet, the receiver finds the seq number as ZERO, what is the
desired behavior..?
Should this result in the anti-replay check failure..?
Should this
-Original Message-
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Dan McDonald
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:48 AM
To: Manish Aggarwal
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Query about SEq Number
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:35:32AM -0500,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 09:34:26AM -0700, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Dan McDonald
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:48 AM
To: Manish Aggarwal
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Pasi,
Many thanks for the great feedback. I will incorporate all these items as part
of the WESP update during the next virtual interim meeting on Sept 22.
Furthermore, I have opened multiple tickets to ensure these are tracked and
resolved.
Some comments inline...and others will result
